Mutual matches
2023.03.19 |
Chicago |
113 : 99
|
Miami |
2.16 |
14.25 |
1.83 |
2022.12.21 |
Miami |
103 : 113
|
Chicago |
1.90 |
14.25 |
2.07 |
2022.10.20 |
Miami |
108 : 116
|
Chicago |
1.31 |
15.75 |
3.96 |
2022.04.03 |
Chicago |
109 : 127
|
Miami |
2.23 |
14.25 |
1.78 |
2022.03.01 |
Miami |
112 : 99
|
Chicago |
1.58 |
14.75 |
2.65 |
2021.12.12 |
Miami |
118 : 92
|
Chicago |
2.12 |
14.50 |
1.85 |
2021.11.28 |
Chicago |
104 : 107
|
Miami |
2.07 |
14.50 |
1.90 |
2021.04.27 |
Miami |
102 : 110
|
Chicago |
1.46 |
15.00 |
3.06 |
2021.04.25 |
Miami |
106 : 101
|
Chicago |
1.59 |
14.50 |
2.61 |
2021.03.13 |
Chicago |
90 : 101
|
Miami |
2.17 |
14.50 |
1.82 |
2019.12.09 |
Miami |
110 : 105
ot |
Chicago |
1.39 |
13.25 |
3.52 |
2019.11.23 |
Chicago |
108 : 116
|
Miami |
2.66 |
12.50 |
1.60 |
2019.01.31 |
Miami |
89 : 105
|
Chicago |
1.20 |
16.00 |
5.80 |
2019.01.20 |
Chicago |
103 : 117
|
Miami |
2.60 |
13.00 |
1.65 |
2018.11.24 |
Chicago |
96 : 103
|
Miami |
2.45 |
12.00 |
1.72 |
2018.03.30 |
Miami |
103 : 92
|
Chicago |
1.08 |
13.00 |
7.75 |
2018.01.15 |
Chicago |
119 : 111
|
Miami |
1.88 |
10.00 |
2.00 |
2017.11.26 |
Chicago |
93 : 100
|
Miami |
3.20 |
12.00 |
1.35 |
2017.11.02 |
Miami |
97 : 91
|
Chicago |
1.22 |
11.50 |
4.60 |
2017.01.28 |
Chicago |
88 : 100
|
Miami |
1.30 |
12.50 |
3.40 |
2016.12.11 |
Chicago |
105 : 100
|
Miami |
1.22 |
12.50 |
4.25 |
2016.11.11 |
Miami |
95 : 98
|
Chicago |
1.90 |
12.00 |
2.00 |
2016.04.08 |
Miami |
106 : 98
|
Chicago |
1.35 |
12.50 |
3.10 |
2016.03.12 |
Chicago |
96 : 118
|
Miami |
2.45 |
12.00 |
1.58 |
2016.03.02 |
Miami |
129 : 111
|
Chicago |
1.45 |
12.50 |
3.00 |
2016.01.26 |
Chicago |
84 : 89
|
Miami |
1.30 |
10.00 |
3.30 |
2015.04.10 |
Miami |
78 : 89
|
Chicago |
1.93 |
12.00 |
1.94 |
2015.01.25 |
Chicago |
84 : 96
|
Miami |
1.25 |
10.00 |
4.20 |
2014.12.15 |
Miami |
75 : 93
|
Chicago |
3.20 |
10.00 |
1.38 |
2014.03.09 |
Chicago |
95 : 88
ot |
Miami |
2.75 |
15.00 |
1.48 |
2014.02.23 |
Miami |
93 : 79
|
Chicago |
1.45 |
15.00 |
2.85 |
2013.12.06 |
Chicago |
107 : 87
|
Miami |
2.65 |
15.00 |
1.50 |
2013.10.30 |
Miami |
107 : 95
|
Chicago |
1.45 |
15.00 |
2.85 |
2013.05.16 |
Miami |
94 : 91
|
Chicago |
1.04 |
- |
11.87 |
2013.05.14 |
Chicago |
65 : 88
|
Miami |
4.05 |
- |
1.25 |
2013.05.11 |
Chicago |
94 : 104
|
Miami |
3.84 |
- |
1.28 |
2013.05.09 |
Miami |
115 : 78
|
Chicago |
1.08 |
- |
8.73 |
2013.05.07 |
Miami |
86 : 93
|
Chicago |
1.08 |
- |
8.50 |
2013.04.14 |
Miami |
105 : 93
|
Chicago |
1.21 |
- |
4.73 |
2013.03.28 |
Chicago |
101 : 97
|
Miami |
2.93 |
- |
1.42 |
2013.02.22 |
Chicago |
67 : 86
|
Miami |
2.29 |
- |
1.65 |
2013.01.05 |
Miami |
89 : 96
|
Chicago |
1.29 |
- |
3.73 |
2012.04.20 |
Miami |
83 : 72
|
Chicago |
1.39 |
- |
3.10 |
2012.04.13 |
Chicago |
96 : 86
ot |
Miami |
1.82 |
- |
2.03 |
2012.03.15 |
Chicago |
106 : 102
|
Miami |
1.82 |
- |
2.04 |
2012.01.29 |
Miami |
97 : 93
|
Chicago |
1.52 |
- |
2.62 |
2011.05.27 |
Chicago |
80 : 83
|
Miami |
1.61 |
- |
2.36 |
2011.05.25 |
Miami |
101 : 93
ot |
Chicago |
1.45 |
- |
2.85 |
2011.05.23 |
Miami |
96 : 85
|
Chicago |
1.49 |
- |
2.71 |
2011.05.19 |
Chicago |
75 : 85
|
Miami |
1.72 |
- |
2.18 |
2011.05.16 |
Chicago |
103 : 82
|
Miami |
1.79 |
- |
2.07 |
2011.03.06 |
Miami |
86 : 87
|
Chicago |
1.45 |
- |
2.81 |
2011.02.25 |
Chicago |
93 : 89
|
Miami |
2.29 |
- |
1.66 |
2011.01.16 |
Chicago |
99 : 96
|
Miami |
1.85 |
- |
2.05 |
2010.03.26 |
Chicago |
74 : 103
|
Miami |
1.80 |
- |
2.05 |
2010.03.13 |
Miami |
108 : 95
|
Chicago |
1.11 |
- |
6.79 |
2010.02.07 |
Chicago |
95 : 91
|
Miami |
1.78 |
- |
2.08 |
2009.11.02 |
Miami |
95 : 87
|
Chicago |
1.53 |
- |
2.59 |
2009.03.27 |
Chicago |
106 : 87
|
Miami |
1.41 |
- |
2.97 |
2009.02.13 |
Chicago |
93 : 95
|
Miami |
1.53 |
- |
2.55 |
2008.12.26 |
Miami |
90 : 77
|
Chicago |
1.42 |
- |
2.95 |
2008.04.09 |
Miami |
95 : 88
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2008.02.15 |
Chicago |
99 : 92
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2008.01.17 |
Miami |
96 : 126
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2007.04.29 |
Miami |
79 : 92
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2007.04.27 |
Miami |
96 : 104
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2007.04.24 |
Chicago |
107 : 89
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2007.04.21 |
Chicago |
96 : 91
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2007.03.07 |
Miami |
103 : 70
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2007.01.27 |
Chicago |
100 : 97
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2006.12.27 |
Chicago |
109 : 103
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2006.10.31 |
Miami |
66 : 108
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2006.05.04 |
Chicago |
96 : 113
|
Miami |
2.11 |
- |
1.77 |
2006.05.02 |
Miami |
92 : 78
|
Chicago |
1.21 |
- |
4.78 |
2006.04.30 |
Chicago |
93 : 87
|
Miami |
2.22 |
- |
1.71 |
2006.04.27 |
Chicago |
109 : 90
|
Miami |
1.93 |
- |
1.93 |
2006.04.24 |
Miami |
115 : 108
|
Chicago |
1.28 |
- |
3.95 |
2006.04.22 |
Miami |
111 : 106
|
Chicago |
1.25 |
- |
4.24 |
2006.04.16 |
Miami |
93 : 117
|
Chicago |
1.59 |
- |
2.46 |
2006.03.18 |
Chicago |
84 : 85
|
Miami |
2.45 |
- |
1.58 |
2005.12.13 |
Chicago |
97 : 100
|
Miami |
2.55 |
- |
1.53 |
2005.04.05 |
Miami |
104 : 86
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2005.02.22 |
Chicago |
105 : 101
ot |
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2005.02.05 |
Miami |
108 : 97
|
Chicago |
1.27 |
- |
3.92 |
2004.12.03 |
Chicago |
81 : 105
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2004.04.03 |
Chicago |
83 : 97
|
Miami |
- |
- |
- |
2004.03.29 |
Miami |
105 : 96
|
Chicago |
1.17 |
- |
5.34 |
2004.01.07 |
Miami |
102 : 95
|
Chicago |
- |
- |
- |
2003.12.29 |
Chicago |
83 : 90
|
Miami |
1.60 |
- |
2.40 |
Chicago
0% (0/76) |
0% (0/76) |
7.89% (6/76) |
92.11% (70/76) |
3.95% (3/76) |
5.26% (4/76) |
10.53% (8/76) |
3.95% (3/76) |
10.53% (8/76) |
6.58% (5/76) |
6.58% (5/76) |
52.63% (40/76) |
50% (38/76) |
48.68% (37/76) |
47.37% (36/76) |
3.95% (3/76) |
2.63% (2/76) |
5.26% (4/76) |
0% (0/76) |
43.42% (33/76) |
47.37% (36/76) |
46.05% (35/76) |
52.63% (40/76) |
25.03% (4296/17163) |
24.64% (4229/17163) |
25.18% (4321/17163) |
24.13% (4141/17163) |
Miami
0% (0/77) |
1.3% (1/77) |
15.58% (12/77) |
83.12% (64/77) |
7.79% (6/77) |
24.68% (19/77) |
7.79% (6/77) |
3.9% (3/77) |
2.6% (2/77) |
2.6% (2/77) |
2.6% (2/77) |
46.75% (36/77) |
53.25% (41/77) |
41.56% (32/77) |
51.95% (40/77) |
5.19% (4/77) |
3.9% (3/77) |
5.19% (4/77) |
0% (0/77) |
48.05% (37/77) |
42.86% (33/77) |
53.25% (41/77) |
48.05% (37/77) |
26.16% (4401/16821) |
25.34% (4262/16821) |
24.62% (4142/16821) |
23.39% (3934/16821) |
Groups
1 |
Milwaukee |
76 |
52 |
3 |
2 |
19 |
8909:8569 |
0.684 |
2 |
Cleveland |
77 |
41 |
7 |
0 |
29 |
8644:8216 |
0.532 |
3 |
Chicago |
76 |
33 |
3 |
4 |
36 |
8612:8551 |
0.434 |
4 |
Indiana |
77 |
32 |
1 |
2 |
42 |
8924:9168 |
0.416 |
5 |
Detroit |
76 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
59 |
8412:9011 |
0.171 |
1 |
Milwaukee |
76 |
52 |
3 |
2 |
19 |
8909:8569 |
0.684 |
2 |
Boston |
76 |
48 |
4 |
7 |
17 |
8970:8511 |
0.632 |
3 |
Philadelphia |
76 |
47 |
3 |
2 |
24 |
8753:8401 |
0.618 |
4 |
Cleveland |
77 |
41 |
7 |
0 |
29 |
8644:8216 |
0.532 |
5 |
New York |
77 |
40 |
4 |
6 |
27 |
8887:8666 |
0.519 |
6 |
Brooklyn |
76 |
40 |
1 |
1 |
34 |
8629:8575 |
0.526 |
7 |
Miami |
77 |
37 |
3 |
2 |
35 |
8370:8451 |
0.481 |
8 |
Toronto |
76 |
36 |
2 |
3 |
35 |
8580:8485 |
0.474 |
9 |
Atlanta |
76 |
35 |
3 |
1 |
37 |
8970:8956 |
0.461 |
10 |
Chicago |
76 |
33 |
3 |
4 |
36 |
8612:8551 |
0.434 |
11 |
Washington |
76 |
33 |
1 |
2 |
40 |
8594:8648 |
0.434 |
12 |
Indiana |
77 |
32 |
1 |
2 |
42 |
8924:9168 |
0.416 |
13 |
Orlando |
76 |
30 |
2 |
2 |
42 |
8491:8676 |
0.395 |
14 |
Charlotte H. |
77 |
25 |
1 |
4 |
47 |
8584:9034 |
0.325 |
15 |
Detroit |
76 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
59 |
8412:9011 |
0.171 |
1 |
Milwaukee |
37 |
29 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4437:4139 |
0.784 |
2 |
Cleveland |
38 |
24 |
6 |
0 |
8 |
4314:3963 |
0.632 |
3 |
Chicago |
38 |
18 |
2 |
1 |
17 |
4340:4247 |
0.474 |
4 |
Indiana |
38 |
18 |
1 |
1 |
18 |
4511:4532 |
0.474 |
5 |
Detroit |
39 |
7 |
2 |
1 |
29 |
4392:4618 |
0.179 |
1 |
Milwaukee |
39 |
23 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
4472:4430 |
0.590 |
2 |
Cleveland |
39 |
17 |
1 |
0 |
21 |
4330:4253 |
0.436 |
3 |
Chicago |
38 |
15 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
4272:4304 |
0.395 |
4 |
Indiana |
39 |
14 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
4413:4636 |
0.359 |
5 |
Detroit |
37 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
4020:4393 |
0.162 |
1 |
Milwaukee |
39 |
23 |
2 |
2 |
12 |
4472:4430 |
0.590 |
2 |
Boston |
39 |
22 |
2 |
3 |
12 |
4489:4405 |
0.564 |
3 |
Philadelphia |
38 |
23 |
0 |
1 |
14 |
4392:4250 |
0.605 |
4 |
New York |
38 |
19 |
3 |
2 |
14 |
4333:4283 |
0.500 |
5 |
Brooklyn |
40 |
20 |
1 |
0 |
19 |
4538:4605 |
0.500 |
6 |
Cleveland |
39 |
17 |
1 |
0 |
21 |
4330:4253 |
0.436 |
7 |
Atlanta |
38 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
21 |
4462:4525 |
0.421 |
8 |
Washington |
39 |
16 |
0 |
1 |
22 |
4370:4427 |
0.410 |
9 |
Chicago |
38 |
15 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
4272:4304 |
0.395 |
10 |
Miami |
38 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
21 |
4053:4163 |
0.342 |
11 |
Indiana |
39 |
14 |
0 |
1 |
24 |
4413:4636 |
0.359 |
12 |
Charlotte H. |
40 |
13 |
0 |
3 |
24 |
4513:4753 |
0.325 |
13 |
Orlando |
38 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
25 |
4139:4309 |
0.342 |
14 |
Toronto |
36 |
10 |
2 |
2 |
22 |
4012:4091 |
0.278 |
15 |
Detroit |
37 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
30 |
4020:4393 |
0.162 |
Here you can check how Chicago compares to Miami by stats. The data is calculated based on matches from NBA. This can be very useful in predicting the outcome of the next match.