Mutual matches
2022.06.23 |
Connecticut |
77 : 81
|
New York |
1.18 |
19.50 |
5.20 |
2022.05.18 |
New York |
65 : 92
|
Connecticut |
4.20 |
17.75 |
1.26 |
2022.05.08 |
New York |
81 : 79
|
Connecticut |
3.21 |
15.25 |
1.40 |
2021.09.16 |
Connecticut |
98 : 69
|
New York |
1.10 |
24.00 |
7.00 |
2021.07.11 |
New York |
54 : 71
|
Connecticut |
3.81 |
17.50 |
1.30 |
2021.06.06 |
Connecticut |
85 : 64
|
New York |
1.22 |
19.25 |
4.60 |
2020.09.02 |
New York |
65 : 70
|
Connecticut |
5.70 |
21.50 |
1.15 |
2020.08.23 |
Connecticut |
82 : 65
|
New York |
1.13 |
22.50 |
6.30 |
2019.08.31 |
New York |
84 : 94
|
Connecticut |
5.40 |
20.50 |
1.17 |
2019.08.04 |
New York |
79 : 94
|
Connecticut |
3.03 |
15.75 |
1.44 |
2019.07.24 |
Connecticut |
70 : 63
|
New York |
1.24 |
19.75 |
4.65 |
2018.08.02 |
Connecticut |
92 : 77
|
New York |
1.12 |
24.00 |
6.80 |
2018.07.11 |
Connecticut |
76 : 79
|
New York |
1.23 |
19.00 |
4.50 |
2018.06.08 |
New York |
86 : 88
|
Connecticut |
3.05 |
16.00 |
1.43 |
2017.08.19 |
Connecticut |
70 : 82
|
New York |
1.42 |
11.00 |
2.95 |
2017.07.19 |
New York |
96 : 80
|
Connecticut |
2.20 |
12.00 |
1.68 |
2017.06.24 |
New York |
89 : 94
|
Connecticut |
1.50 |
12.00 |
2.65 |
2017.06.15 |
Connecticut |
96 : 76
|
New York |
1.90 |
10.50 |
1.95 |
2016.09.10 |
New York |
89 : 82
|
Connecticut |
1.40 |
11.00 |
3.00 |
2016.07.17 |
New York |
83 : 76
|
Connecticut |
1.25 |
11.00 |
4.00 |
2016.06.17 |
Connecticut |
72 : 80
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2015.09.10 |
New York |
74 : 64
|
Connecticut |
1.11 |
15.50 |
7.25 |
2015.08.30 |
Connecticut |
66 : 80
|
New York |
3.15 |
14.50 |
1.38 |
2015.08.15 |
Connecticut |
78 : 90
|
New York |
2.67 |
14.00 |
1.50 |
2015.07.17 |
New York |
64 : 57
|
Connecticut |
1.35 |
15.50 |
3.30 |
2014.08.09 |
New York |
71 : 66
|
Connecticut |
1.60 |
15.00 |
2.40 |
2014.06.29 |
New York |
67 : 65
|
Connecticut |
1.65 |
14.00 |
2.30 |
2014.06.15 |
Connecticut |
76 : 72
|
New York |
1.80 |
14.00 |
2.05 |
2014.06.14 |
New York |
75 : 83
|
Connecticut |
1.38 |
16.00 |
3.15 |
2014.05.17 |
Connecticut |
54 : 75
|
New York |
1.60 |
15.00 |
2.40 |
2013.08.25 |
Connecticut |
66 : 74
|
New York |
1.68 |
14.00 |
2.25 |
2013.08.04 |
New York |
66 : 88
|
Connecticut |
1.47 |
- |
2.75 |
2013.06.15 |
New York |
78 : 68
|
Connecticut |
1.82 |
- |
2.00 |
2013.05.26 |
Connecticut |
81 : 69
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2012.09.30 |
New York |
62 : 75
|
Connecticut |
2.50 |
- |
1.55 |
2012.09.28 |
Connecticut |
65 : 60
|
New York |
1.18 |
- |
5.00 |
2012.08.19 |
Connecticut |
85 : 74
|
New York |
1.30 |
- |
3.60 |
2012.08.17 |
New York |
79 : 66
|
Connecticut |
2.55 |
- |
1.53 |
2012.06.16 |
Connecticut |
97 : 55
|
New York |
1.26 |
- |
4.00 |
2012.05.20 |
Connecticut |
92 : 77
|
New York |
1.35 |
- |
3.33 |
2012.05.19 |
New York |
73 : 78
|
Connecticut |
2.08 |
- |
1.79 |
2011.09.11 |
Connecticut |
69 : 63
|
New York |
1.42 |
- |
2.91 |
2011.08.19 |
New York |
84 : 81
ot |
Connecticut |
1.72 |
- |
2.15 |
2011.07.19 |
Connecticut |
85 : 79
|
New York |
1.43 |
- |
2.91 |
2011.07.15 |
New York |
59 : 68
|
Connecticut |
1.42 |
- |
2.93 |
2010.08.22 |
New York |
88 : 87
ot |
Connecticut |
1.29 |
- |
3.64 |
2010.08.01 |
New York |
71 : 67
|
Connecticut |
1.57 |
- |
2.44 |
2010.07.21 |
Connecticut |
74 : 82
ot |
New York |
1.35 |
- |
3.28 |
2010.06.27 |
New York |
77 : 68
|
Connecticut |
1.83 |
- |
1.99 |
2010.06.04 |
Connecticut |
75 : 68
|
New York |
1.39 |
- |
3.04 |
2009.09.05 |
Connecticut |
88 : 85
ot |
New York |
1.45 |
- |
2.81 |
2009.08.22 |
New York |
85 : 83
ot |
Connecticut |
1.63 |
- |
2.33 |
2009.08.20 |
Connecticut |
74 : 69
|
New York |
1.42 |
- |
2.93 |
2009.06.07 |
New York |
57 : 66
|
Connecticut |
1.52 |
- |
2.60 |
2008.09.23 |
Connecticut |
62 : 66
|
New York |
1.34 |
- |
3.35 |
2008.09.21 |
Connecticut |
73 : 70
|
New York |
1.32 |
- |
3.44 |
2008.09.19 |
New York |
72 : 63
|
Connecticut |
1.82 |
- |
2.02 |
2008.07.16 |
Connecticut |
71 : 77
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2008.05.31 |
Connecticut |
89 : 84
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2008.05.18 |
New York |
63 : 77
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2007.08.17 |
New York |
74 : 66
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2007.07.29 |
New York |
61 : 67
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2007.07.26 |
Connecticut |
79 : 75
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2007.06.20 |
Connecticut |
73 : 76
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2006.08.01 |
Connecticut |
66 : 52
|
New York |
1.04 |
- |
11.00 |
2006.07.24 |
New York |
71 : 89
|
Connecticut |
5.50 |
- |
1.15 |
2006.06.07 |
New York |
60 : 75
|
Connecticut |
4.50 |
- |
1.21 |
2006.05.20 |
Connecticut |
91 : 74
|
New York |
1.12 |
- |
6.50 |
2005.08.20 |
Connecticut |
58 : 64
|
New York |
1.31 |
- |
3.50 |
2005.08.02 |
New York |
65 : 72
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2005.07.28 |
Connecticut |
73 : 70
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2005.07.07 |
New York |
89 : 79
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2004.10.03 |
Connecticut |
60 : 57
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2004.10.02 |
New York |
51 : 61
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2004.09.17 |
Connecticut |
66 : 69
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2004.09.10 |
New York |
66 : 77
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2004.09.03 |
Connecticut |
61 : 43
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2004.07.31 |
New York |
80 : 66
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2003.08.16 |
New York |
71 : 84
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
2003.08.12 |
Connecticut |
73 : 74
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2003.07.06 |
Connecticut |
62 : 58
|
New York |
- |
- |
- |
2003.07.01 |
New York |
90 : 64
|
Connecticut |
- |
- |
- |
Connecticut
15% (3/20) |
55% (11/20) |
30% (6/20) |
0% (0/20) |
0% (0/20) |
5% (1/20) |
20% (4/20) |
15% (3/20) |
0% (0/20) |
10% (2/20) |
15% (3/20) |
55% (11/20) |
65% (13/20) |
60% (12/20) |
65% (13/20) |
0% (0/20) |
5% (1/20) |
0% (0/20) |
0% (0/20) |
45% (9/20) |
30% (6/20) |
40% (8/20) |
35% (7/20) |
25.57% (833/3258) |
24.89% (811/3258) |
23.57% (768/3258) |
25.97% (846/3258) |
New York
5.26% (1/19) |
73.68% (14/19) |
21.05% (4/19) |
0% (0/19) |
5.26% (1/19) |
10.53% (2/19) |
0% (0/19) |
15.79% (3/19) |
5.26% (1/19) |
5.26% (1/19) |
0% (0/19) |
36.84% (7/19) |
31.58% (6/19) |
47.37% (9/19) |
42.11% (8/19) |
0% (0/19) |
0% (0/19) |
0% (0/19) |
0% (0/19) |
63.16% (12/19) |
68.42% (13/19) |
52.63% (10/19) |
57.89% (11/19) |
24.05% (725/3014) |
24.92% (751/3014) |
23.82% (718/3014) |
25.32% (763/3014) |
Groups
Here you can check how Connecticut compares to New York by stats. The data is calculated based on matches from WNBA. This can be very useful in predicting the outcome of the next match.